IT & Cybersecurity for Law Firms | Primetime IT Solutions

What law firms face

The threat model for legal isn’t generic. Attackers target you specifically.

Law firms hold concentrated, high-value, time-sensitive data. Wire instructions during real-estate closings. Privileged communications. M&A documents. Settlement amounts. Adversaries know the calendar — and they aim for the soft moments.

Real-estate wire fraud
Compromised paralegal mailbox, AI-cloned voice CFO call to escrow, last-minute wire-instruction swap. Mid-six-figure losses on a single closing.
Attorney mobile-device exposure
Partner laptop at the airport. Personal iPhone with email. Untracked, unencrypted, often without MFA on a key app. One stolen device, one Bar grievance.
Privileged communications in shadow AI
Associates pasting briefs into ChatGPT to summarize. Privileged client material absorbed into third-party logs. Bar Rule 1.6 violation by default.
Document-management sprawl
NetDocuments / iManage / SharePoint side-by-side. Permissions unclear. Outside-counsel access never revoked. Conflicts checks behind by 18 months.
Insurance + Bar pressure together
Cyber-insurance carriers and the Bar both now ask about MFA, backup, AI usage, and tech-competence. Wrong answer on one is wrong answer on both.

Get a Free Legal IT Assessment →

What we deploy at law firms

The tech-competence stack — documented.

Built around ABA Model Rule 1.6, the FL Bar’s ethics opinions on technology, and modern cyber-insurance underwriting requirements.

Bar-grade confidentiality stack

Encryption at rest and in transit. Entra Conditional Access. MFA enforced including outside-counsel and admin accounts. Audit trail end-to-end.

Document-management support

NetDocuments, iManage, Worldox, or SharePoint as your DMS. Integration with Outlook and Word. Mobile access policies. Outside-counsel collaboration without exposing the whole library.

Attorney mobility & MDM

Intune (or Jamf for Mac firms). Encryption enforced. Wipe-on-loss. App-protection policies for email/files on personal devices. Mobile work without mobile risk.

Legal-AI governance

Sanctioned-tool list with Harvey, Casetext, Lexis+ AI, Copilot, Claude. Prompt-data boundary enforced. Privileged-data labels. Prompt-injection guardrails for retrieval-augmented agents.

Wire-fraud defense

Defender for Office anti-impersonation, payee-name verification policies, callback workflow, vendor-banking-change procedure. Built around the real-estate closing scenarios where losses happen.

Backup with legal-hold awareness

Immutable backups of M365, document-management, file shares. Retention tuned to record-retention obligations and FRCP-aware. Tested restores per quarter.

Cyber-insurance attestation

We complete the carrier questionnaire and attest to the controls. We flag gaps before submission. Renewals get easier, premiums get reviewable.

Conflicts-check uptime

Conflicts and matter-intake systems integrated, monitored, backed up. The system that protects you from disqualification can’t be the one that’s down.

vCIO for managing partner

Quarterly business review tailored to the partner-level audience — tech-competence posture, security trajectory, AI policy status, budget vs roadmap. Plain English, defensible.

Legal AI · the new tech competence

Harvey, Casetext, Copilot — sanctioned, governed, defensible.

The Bar’s technology-competence duty now extends to AI tools. That doesn’t mean banning them — it means knowing which ones you sanctioned, how they handle client data, who’s trained on them, and how you’d explain the deployment to the grievance committee. We build that documentation as part of the engagement.

Sanctioned-tool list per practice area
Litigation may use Casetext. Transactional may lean Harvey. M&A diligence stays in Copilot inside the tenant. Each tool documented with its data boundary.
Privileged-data labels
Sensitivity labels on client matters. DLP that blocks paste into unsanctioned AI tools. The technical control that backs up the policy.
Training built for attorneys
30-minute training framed in Bar-rule language. Practical examples: what to paste, what not to, how to verify AI output, when to flag a prompt. Recorded for laterals.
Defensible documentation
AUP, training records, sanctioned-tool inventory, DLP enforcement screenshots. Ready if the grievance committee, the insurance carrier, or opposing counsel ever asks.

See AI Services in Detail →

“The Bar isn’t banning AI. They’re asking what your AI policy is. Most firms can’t answer.”

Laz De La Vega · Practice Lead, Primetime IT Solutions

Common questions

What law firms ask on the first call.

How do we get NetDocuments / iManage right in M365?

The integration matters more than the platform. We tune the Outlook plugin, profile attorney workflow against the matter-centric filing pattern, handle the document-ID and metadata mapping correctly, and configure mobile access without exposing the whole library. The DMS becomes invisible to attorneys when it’s right.

What does Bar tech-competence actually require?

ABA Model Rule 1.1 Comment 8 (adopted in Florida) requires lawyers to keep current with technology — including benefits and risks. In practice: reasonable safeguards for client confidentiality, basic literacy on the tech you use, and now (per multiple state ethics opinions) the same standard for AI tools. We help operationalize that with documented policy and controls.

Can you support a Mac-heavy firm?

Yes — common in litigation and IP boutiques. Jamf for MDM where preferred, Intune+macOS where M365-native. SentinelOne on Macs. Conditional Access for all platforms. Microsoft Office for Mac with the document-management plugin. We support mixed-OS firms without favoring one.

How do you handle outside-counsel access?

B2B guest invitations in Entra with time-bound access to specific matter folders only. Sensitivity labels travel with the document. Watermarks where appropriate. Audit log of every access. Revocation at matter close — not 18 months later.

Will you sign our cyber-insurance application?

Yes. We complete the carrier questionnaire, attest to controls we operate, and supply evidence. We flag where the firm wouldn’t pass and recommend the targeted remediation needed for renewal — before submission.

IT for law firms where confidentiality is the product.